What the Hell is a Cinemagraph?

I interact, like most of you, with a group of photographers.  Recently, one I respect, brought to my attention a website that featured “The next ‘big thing’ in photography…’Cinemagraphy.’” This really begs the question does any photographer really respect any other photographer…I’m speaking of our peers, not guys like Alec Soth or Dan Winters…nope we don’t…really if you’re shaking your head or rolling your eyes, stop and confirm that little voice inside…if you are reading this with another photog…then one of you is better than the other and knows it…I digress.    So he’s all abuzz about this fantastic new concept…I imagine it is something akin to a Topaz filter in Photoshop, that fakes HDR…that is what the world really needs is more fake (or real for that matter) HDR.  Wrong.  I will admit, upon first sight, the whimsy of the concept was entertaining…and then it just pissed me off.

Image: Jamie Beck   http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com

Okay…snap out of it dammit!  I know, my first thought was also Harry Potter too.   This enchanting lady could be adorning the nightstand or desktop at Hogwarts.   A novel concept except that it isn’t photography…it is an animated GIF.  Like those found on SeniorGif.com.   

Image: Jamie Beck   http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com

 

  They also can be a little creepy.  So about the time I thought I needed to tell you about this I did some research and they’re everywhere.  No, not the concept.  The actual work…featured in the Atlantic, and on Ology.com.  The Photographer is Jamie Beck, a very talented Fashion and lifestyle photographer from NYC. This may prove to be a big stepping stone  for Beck. 

Image: Jamie Beck   http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com

 

Alright, by now you either really like this or really don’t…Let me be first in line to say this:  Jamie Beck has got killer chops.  Her work is really impeccable.   I love the post-war feel, and inspired style in her portfolio.  Her “Statuesque” portfolio illustrates her technical prowess with a camera…as well as her ability to compose a moving photo (I mean this emotionally…not actually moving) from an over-photographed subject.  But…

isn’t this….

Image: Jamie Beck   http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com

pretty much the same as this….

I know it isn’t…but this will catch on…You’re going to see this everywhere.  Oh God…wait until the hipsters find out about this. 

Maybe I just think she’s more talented than me and I’m angry I didn’t think of this first…I saw all of the Potter films too, dammit. 

They are very cool.  They are very neat.  They're very well made. But is it Photography?  I guess I’ll just wait for the book…oh wait.

Richard Prince ordered to destroy (someone else’s) lucrative artwork

A US federal judge ruled against the Gagosian gallery and Prince for unfair use of “appropriated” images.

Click the Photo to view the story.  Photograph: Canal Zone

 

As a photographer I am naturally opposed to Mr. Prince’s practice of “Rephotography”…I have never really understood how anyone could appreciate it.  I would generally refer to it as simply ‘hipster garbage’.  So to really analyze it I have to remove myself from my thoughts and feelings as a photog. 

As far as technique goes….he could be using a xerox for all that matters…really.  Lets just get past this.  His composition…photographically, isn’t his own…however through perspective and creative cropping he does impart his own composition to this work…(sorry; inner feelings)  Seriously…the real ‘Art’ in this is the mutilation of the photographs…taken by French photographer Patrick Cariou.  This very well is the heart of it.  I feel its a indictment of society or maybe the photographer or maybe both….let me explain.  Prince removes faces or facial features like eyes…mouth, etc.  Removing that seems to remove the very “soul” of a photo…to us in the west….the actual soul to others namely…we are to assume, those pictured.  It is also an indictment of how we prefer to see things in this nature…How we can peruse the local grocery magazine rack, smilingly flip through a National Geographic mag…taking in the horrible suffering from around the globe….then glibly grab our Pop-Tarts and pick up Junior at soccer.  An indictment of the Photog for feeding us those images; well composed photos of interesting – but dangerous – people-things. 

But does Prince use these photos like a child uses newsprint in Papier Mache?  I don’t think so…because of those artistic accusations…the artwork wouldn’t feel at all the same if these were just throw away shots of anybodies. 

The reality is Richard Prince’s work only really works if it is someone else’s.  It drives the story…yeah, the PR.  Prince is self admittedly talentless…someone with his same intent could simply take very similar pictures and use those…and that is it really.  The art is repulsive to some…brilliant to others – that is what it take in today’s market.  Something controversial…and lots of PR.

Me…I find it fucking stupid.  I would probably kick his ass and photograph it rapid release with rear curtain flash…(so it looked like I was the Flash – that’s the superhero-you strobist punks)  

Anyway…He lost in court not for any reason relating to the actual use of the photos…but because the value of Mr Cariou’s photos were now diminished…Yep.

I would like to see Carious’ face the first time he showed the work and someone said “isn’t that a Prince?”

Welcome to You Call This Photography

Photography is the art, science and practice of recording light on some kind of film or image sensor.  That pretty much nails it all….from Richard Avedon to that dude in the men’s room making kissy faces at his iPhone.  Modern Photographic composition has blurred the lines even more…I literally have seen those kissy face shots hanging in a gallery in SoHo. 

First off…I am not anointing myself some kind of Master of the universe of photography…(By the power of Nikon…I have the power!)  But rather an arbiter of reason and technique…products and equipment. 

For instance, the photo above, I shot that in the middle of the day…I had my kids with me and didn’t really have a ton of time to expose properly…I blew out the sky…pretty badly too.  I converted it to a high-key B&W and felt it was a little better…not really.  When I look at it for any length of time it just feels off.

Maybe photography is really about intent.  I shot said photo without any real composition or intent…however in development I did intend to make the image an artful one through creative editing…I failed.  But I am really critical…seriously.

So…lets get the party started and lets talk photography…let me see some of your shots or questions and we’ll tear them apart…constructively….maybe,  I can be a real jack-ass…but I warned you first.

Thanks for all the fish...

Hey...we're just getting everything back up and running around here so have a little patience and we'll be back online soon.